The Role of the Military in Philippine Politics

The military has long played a significant role in shaping the political landscape of the Philippines. From ensuring national security to influencing governance, its presence is deeply intertwined with the country’s history and current affairs. Recent events, such as the Davao City bomb blast and the ongoing “war on drugs,” highlight the evolving responsibilities of the armed forces in maintaining order.

Historically, the service of the military has extended beyond traditional defense roles. Under the Philippine Constitution, the President can deploy armed forces to address lawless violence, a provision that has been invoked multiple times. This expanded role raises important questions about the balance between security and human rights, as seen in international examples like Mexico’s struggles with drug cartels.

Understanding the interplay between military involvement and political decision-making is crucial for anyone interested in governance, defense, or public policy. This article will explore historical legacies, policy impacts, and societal perceptions, providing a comprehensive view of the military’s influence in the Philippines.

Key Takeaways

• The military plays a key role in Philippine governance and national security.
• Recent events highlight the evolving responsibilities of the armed forces.
• The Philippine Constitution allows the President to deploy the military to address lawless violence.
• Military involvement raises questions about the balance between security and human rights.
• Understanding this topic is essential for those interested in defense and public policy.

Historical Legacy and the Evolution of the Armed Forces in the Philippines

The roots of the Philippine armed forces trace back to pivotal moments in history. From its formation in 1935 to its role in global conflicts, the armed forces have evolved significantly. This evolution reflects the nation’s struggles and triumphs, shaping its political and social landscape.

Historical Milestones Shaping Military Influence

One of the earliest milestones was the participation of the Philippine Expeditionary Forces to Korea (PEFTOK) from 1951 to 1953. This marked the country’s first major international job in global peacekeeping. The establishment of the Women’s Auxiliary Corps in 1963 further diversified the armed forces, integrating women into critical roles.

During the martial law period, the armed forces expanded their job beyond defense. They enforced price controls and suppressed demonstrations, reflecting a shift in their responsibilities. This period also saw a significant reshuffle in leadership, with fourteen flag officers forcibly retired under President Marcos.

The Legacy of Military Engagement in Politics

The armed forces’ influence extends beyond defense. Their involvement in governance during martial law set precedents for later policy decisions. For example, the military’s role in enforcing order during the Cold War era mirrored practices seen in the u.s. military, highlighting a shared legacy of strategic engagement.

Modernization efforts in recent decades have further transformed the armed forces. From adopting advanced technologies to enhancing job specialization, these reforms reflect a commitment to staying relevant in a changing world. The u.s. has played a role in this process, providing training and resources to support these advancements.

Understanding this historical legacy is crucial for analyzing the armed forces’ current role. Their evolution from a small defense force to a multifaceted institution mirrors the nation’s journey. By learning from the past, we can better appreciate their contributions to governance and security.

Overview of the Philippine Political Landscape

Political dynamics in the Philippines are deeply rooted in its institutional structure. The country operates as a unitary presidential republic, with a framework that balances power among the executive, legislative, and judicial branches. This system ensures that governance remains responsive to the needs of its 115 million citizens.

The President, elected through a direct popular vote, serves a single six-year term. This role is pivotal in shaping national policies, including those related to health and welfare. The Congress, a bicameral body, consists of the Senate and the House of Representatives. Together, they craft laws that address societal challenges and promote public benefit.

Recent legislative reforms highlight the government’s commitment to improving public services. For example, the Universal Health Care Act aims to provide comprehensive health coverage for all Filipinos. Such initiatives demonstrate how political decisions directly impact the population’s well-being.

The judiciary, led by the Supreme Court, ensures that laws align with the Constitution. This branch plays a critical role in maintaining checks and balances, safeguarding democratic principles. The Ombudsman, serving a seven-year term, further strengthens accountability in governance.

Political stability in the Philippines is closely tied to societal benefit. Reforms in governance and public policy aim to address long-standing issues like corruption and inequality. These efforts are essential for fostering trust in institutions and promoting national progress.

Understanding the Philippine political landscape provides insights into its governance and societal challenges. By examining its institutional structure and recent reforms, we can appreciate the efforts to enhance public health and overall benefit. This framework sets the stage for further discussions on the military’s role in shaping the nation’s future.

Military Impact on Governance and Policy

Veteran leadership has played a pivotal role in driving governmental reforms. Their firsthand experiences in conflict and strategy often translate into effective policy-making. This influence is particularly evident in national security and defense strategies, where their insights are invaluable.

Training programs within the armed forces have also shaped policy formulation. These programs focus on leadership development, equipping personnel with skills to address complex governance challenges. For example, specialized training in crisis management has led to more effective responses to natural disasters and civil unrest.

Analysis of Military Involvement in Policy Making

The armed forces’ involvement in policy-making extends beyond traditional defense roles. Veterans often bring a unique perspective to governance, emphasizing discipline and strategic planning. This has led to reforms in areas like public safety and infrastructure development.

In the Philippines, veteran-led initiatives have addressed issues such as corruption and inefficiency. Their influence is evident in policies that prioritize transparency and accountability. These reforms have strengthened public trust in government institutions.

Governmental Reforms Influenced by Military Actions

Military interventions have often triggered significant governmental reforms. For instance, the restructuring of security agencies following major conflicts has improved coordination and efficiency. These changes highlight the strategic importance of military input in governance.

Training practices within the armed forces also contribute to broader policy realignment. By fostering leadership skills, these programs ensure that military personnel are prepared to take on roles in civilian governance. This integration of military and civilian expertise enhances overall policy effectiveness.

Historical examples from the U.S. and other countries demonstrate the global relevance of this dynamic. The Philippines continues to draw lessons from these experiences, adapting them to its unique political and social context.

The Intersection of Military Leadership and Civil Society

Citizens in the Philippines often view military leadership through a lens shaped by both history and contemporary events. Their perceptions are influenced by the armed forces’ role in national security, disaster response, and community engagement. This dynamic creates a unique interplay between military authority and civil society.

Citizen Perceptions and Expectations

Public opinion on military leadership varies widely. Many see members of the armed forces as symbols of discipline and national pride. Their involvement in disaster relief, such as during Typhoon Haiyan, has bolstered their image as protectors of the people.

However, some critics argue that the use of force in certain situations raises concerns about human rights. Media coverage often amplifies these debates, shaping public expectations. For example, opinion pieces in major outlets like Philippine Daily Inquirer highlight both praise and criticism of military actions.

The concept of force extends beyond physical might. It includes the symbolic authority that military leaders wield in shaping national unity. This authority is evident in their participation in civic events and public outreach programs.

Case studies on civic engagement reveal a growing interest in national security topics. Citizens increasingly expect transparency and accountability from military leaders. This shift reflects a broader trend toward participatory governance.

Media representation plays a crucial role in shaping public trust. Positive coverage of military efforts in conflict zones or disaster areas can enhance credibility. Conversely, negative reports can erode confidence, highlighting the delicate balance between action and perception.

Ultimately, the relationship between military leadership and civil society is multifaceted. By understanding citizen perceptions and expectations, we can better appreciate the armed forces’ role in fostering national progress.

Political Power Dynamics and Military Interventions

The balance of power between politicians and the armed forces remains a critical issue in the Philippines. Over the years, military interventions have shaped political decisions, often marking turning points in governance. For example, in the year 1986, the People Power Revolution saw the armed forces withdraw support from President Marcos, leading to his ouster.

Political leaders frequently attempt to find common ground with military institutions to ensure stability. In 2001, President Arroyo relied on military backing to consolidate her position during the EDSA II uprising. This highlights the delicate relationship between civilian authority and military influence.

Investigative reports reveal both covert and overt actions by the armed forces. For instance, in the year 2017, allegations surfaced about military involvement in extrajudicial killings during the war on drugs. Such actions raise questions about the limits of military power in governance.

Case studies show how military support has influenced election outcomes. In 2016, the endorsement of key military figures played a role in President Duterte’s victory. This underscores the armed forces’ ability to sway public opinion and political results.

• Military interventions often align with political shifts, as seen in 1986 and 2001.
• Political leaders strive to find ways to collaborate with military institutions.
• Specific years, like 2017, mark significant turning points in political-military relations.
• Investigative reports highlight the impact of both covert and overt military actions.

The evolving nature of power dynamics between politicians and the armed forces has profound implications for national stability. By examining historical data and recent events, we can better understand the complexities of this relationship.

Organizational Structure and Roles within the Armed Forces

Understanding the organizational framework of the armed forces is essential for grasping their operational efficiency. The Philippine armed forces operate under a well-defined hierarchy, ensuring clear roles and responsibilities. This structure is critical for maintaining discipline and achieving mission success.

At the core of this system are formal schools and training institutions. These institutions play a pivotal role in professional development, equipping personnel with the skills needed for leadership and technical expertise. For example, the Philippine Military Academy is renowned for shaping future officers through rigorous programs.

The hierarchical structure includes various ranks, each with specific duties. Enlisted personnel focus on technical tasks, while officers oversee planning and administration. This division ensures that every member contributes effectively to the mission.

Modern adaptations in the armed forces reflect the challenges of today. Technological advancements and evolving threats have led to organizational changes. For instance, the integration of cyber defense units highlights the need for specialized skills in contemporary warfare.

Career progression within the armed forces is well-defined. From entry-level roles to senior leadership, each step requires continuous learning and development. Formal schools and training programs are integral to this process, ensuring personnel are prepared for higher responsibilities.

Globally, military organizations are adopting similar structures to enhance efficiency. The Philippine armed forces draw inspiration from these models while tailoring them to local needs. This approach ensures relevance in a rapidly changing world.

The role of educational institutions in shaping careers cannot be overstated. From basic training to advanced courses, these schools provide the foundation for success. They ensure that personnel are equipped to handle the complexities of today’s operational environment.

In conclusion, the organizational structure of the armed forces is a testament to their commitment to excellence. By understanding this framework, we gain insight into their operational efficiency and adaptability in the face of modern challenges.

National Security Strategies and Defense Priorities

In recent years, the Philippines has faced a shifting landscape of security threats, prompting a reevaluation of its national defense strategies. From territorial disputes in the South China Sea to internal insurgencies, the country must navigate complex challenges to ensure stability.

The National Security Strategy (NSS) serves as a cornerstone for addressing these issues. It outlines key priorities, such as enhancing maritime security and countering terrorism. Recent reports highlight the importance of integrating the workforce into these plans, ensuring that personnel are equipped to handle modern threats.

Evolving Security Challenges in the Region

Regional dynamics play a significant role in shaping the Philippines’ defense priorities. The rise of non-state actors and cyber threats has added layers of complexity to national security. For example, recent test deployments in contested areas demonstrate the country’s commitment to safeguarding its interests.

Internal threats, such as insurgencies and organized crime, also demand attention. The integration of advanced training programs for the workforce has been crucial in addressing these issues. These programs focus on enhancing skills in intelligence gathering and crisis management.

• Maritime security remains a top priority due to territorial disputes.
• Counter-terrorism efforts are bolstered by advanced workforce training.
• Cyber threats and non-state actors present new challenges for national defense.

International pressures further influence the Philippines’ security policies. Collaborations with allies, such as the U.S., provide valuable resources and expertise. For instance, joint exercises and technology sharing have strengthened the country’s defense capabilities.

Cutting-edge modernization efforts are essential for staying ahead of evolving threats. Investments in technology and infrastructure ensure that the workforce remains prepared for future challenges. These efforts reflect a proactive approach to national security.

By analyzing regional dynamics and leveraging international partnerships, the Philippines continues to adapt its strategies. This adaptability is crucial for maintaining stability in an increasingly complex security environment.

Economic Considerations: Defense Spending and Its Impacts

Defense spending plays a crucial role in shaping the economic landscape of the Philippines. Allocating financial resources to national security influences public policy, workforce development, and overall economic stability. Recent economic reports highlight the importance of balancing these expenditures with other national priorities.

One key area of focus is the role of the recruiter in fostering essential skills within the armed forces. Financial investments in recruitment and training programs ensure that personnel are equipped to handle modern security challenges. For example, specialized training in cybersecurity and disaster response has become a priority in recent years.

Budget allocations for defense also have broader economic implications. According to recent data, increased spending in this sector can stimulate job creation and workforce development. However, it is essential to consider the opportunity cost of these expenditures. Resources directed toward defense may limit investments in areas like education or infrastructure.

• Defense spending impacts national finances and public policy.
• Recruitment strategies foster essential skills in the workforce.
• Budget allocations for defense influence job creation and economic growth.

Economic considerations also shape recruitment policies. For instance, the Philippines has implemented targeted programs to attract skilled individuals to the armed forces. These initiatives aim to address both national security needs and workforce development goals.

Understanding the economic impact of defense spending is crucial for informed decision-making. As the Philippines navigates complex security challenges, balancing national security with budgetary constraints remains a key priority. For more insights into economic policies, visit this detailed analysis.

Training Programs, Education, and Skill Development in the Armed Services

Education and skill development form the backbone of effective service in the armed forces. Training programs are meticulously designed to equip personnel with the skills needed for operational excellence and leadership. From basic training to advanced courses, these programs ensure readiness for diverse challenges.

One way these programs stand out is through their methodological precision. Each course is structured to address specific roles, ensuring that personnel are well-prepared for their responsibilities. For example, specialized training in cybersecurity and disaster response has become a priority in recent years.

State-of-the-art facilities play a crucial role in enhancing the quality of training. Modern training centers are equipped with advanced technology, providing realistic simulations and hands-on experiences. This contrasts with historical standards, where resources were often limited.

Continuous learning is emphasized throughout a service member’s career. Programs like the Specialized Skills Training ensure that personnel stay updated on emerging technologies and techniques. This adaptability is essential in a rapidly changing operational environment.

Training programs also prepare service members for civilian career paths. By fostering leadership and technical skills, these programs open doors to opportunities beyond the armed forces. This dual focus ensures long-term benefits for both individuals and society.

In conclusion, training programs in the armed services are a way to ensure operational readiness and career development. By integrating state-of-the-art facilities and continuous learning, these programs prepare personnel for both military and civilian success.

Recruitment Practices and Career Pathways in the Military

Recruitment in the armed forces is a gateway to diverse career opportunities. The process is designed to identify talent and ensure security at every step. From initial screening to advanced training, each phase prepares recruits for meaningful roles.

Enlistment Trends in the Philippines

Current enlistment trends reflect a growing interest in specialized roles. Recruitment methods focus on matching skills with operational needs. For example, advanced security protocols are used to verify backgrounds and ensure suitability.

Career progression is structured to support long-term growth. Entry-level roles, such as Second Lieutenant, lead to higher responsibilities like Captain. Programs like the Green to Gold initiative help enlisted personnel transition to officer roles.

• Recruitment emphasizes security and skill alignment.
• Career pathways offer clear progression and professional development.
• Specialized training prepares recruits for modern challenges.

For those interested in explore military careers, the process is transparent and supportive. Dedicated career guidance ensures recruits find roles that match their skills and aspirations.

Comparative Perspectives: U.S. Military Models and Philippine Practices

Examining U.S. military models offers valuable insights into Philippine practices. Both nations share a history of collaboration, but their approaches to training, organization, and modernization differ significantly. By analyzing these differences, we can better understand the strengths and challenges of each system.

One key area of comparison is training protocols. The U.S. military emphasizes advanced programs in leadership and technical skills. For example, the U.S. Army’s Specialized Skills Training focuses on preparing personnel for complex operational environments. In contrast, the Philippines has adapted these models to address local challenges, such as counter-terrorism and disaster response.

Organizational structures also highlight distinct approaches. The U.S. military operates under a highly centralized hierarchy, ensuring clear roles and responsibilities. The Philippines, while adopting similar frameworks, has tailored its structure to reflect its unique operational needs. For instance, the integration of cyber defense units in the Philippines mirrors U.S. advancements but focuses on regional threats.

Role divisions in both militaries reveal further contrasts. In the U.S., specialized roles like cyber warfare and intelligence are well-defined. The Philippines has begun implementing similar programs, but resource limitations often hinder full adoption. Despite these challenges, the Philippines has made strides in modernizing its armed forces, drawing lessons from U.S. initiatives.

Leadership development is another critical area. U.S. military programs emphasize continuous learning and adaptability. The Philippines has adopted similar principles, but implementation varies due to resource constraints. Despite these differences, both nations recognize the importance of leadership in maintaining operational efficiency.

Modernization efforts in the Philippines have been influenced by U.S. strategies. For example, the adoption of advanced technologies and training methods reflects a commitment to staying relevant. However, challenges such as budget limitations and regional instability persist, highlighting the complexities of adopting foreign models.

In conclusion, comparative analysis of U.S. and Philippine military practices reveals both shared goals and distinct approaches. By learning from each other, both nations can enhance their defense capabilities and address evolving security challenges.

Media Representation and Public Discourse on the Military’s Role

Media plays a pivotal role in shaping how the public perceives the armed forces. Through news reports, documentaries, and social media, the armed forces’ actions and policies are often scrutinized. This representation can significantly influence public opinion and policy decisions.

Various media resources, such as newspapers, television, and online platforms, provide diverse perspectives on the armed forces. For example, documentaries like The Fog of War offer in-depth analyses of military strategies, while news features highlight both achievements and controversies. These resources help shape narratives that inform public discourse.

Public discourse around the armed forces evolves through these media channels. Positive coverage, such as reports on disaster relief efforts, can enhance public trust. Conversely, critical perspectives, like investigative reports on human rights issues, may lead to calls for accountability. This dynamic interplay between media and public opinion is crucial for understanding societal attitudes.

Case studies demonstrate how media can impact policy and perception. For instance, the coverage of the Canadian Forces’ media interactions highlights the importance of transparency in fostering public understanding. Such examples underscore the need for balanced reporting to avoid discrepancies between media portrayal and official communications.

Ultimately, the value of multiple resources lies in their ability to provide a well-rounded view. By examining diverse media narratives, the public can form informed opinions about the armed forces’ role in society. This approach ensures that discussions remain grounded in facts rather than misconceptions.

Legislative and Policy Reforms Affecting the Armed Forces

Policy reforms are reshaping the responsibilities and oversight mechanisms of the armed forces. Recent legislative reforms have introduced significant changes to enhance operational efficiency and governance. These updates aim to modernize the armed forces while ensuring accountability and transparency.

One notable example is the Republic Act No. 7898, also known as the AFP Modernization Act. This law focuses on force restructuring, capability development, and human resource enhancement over a 15-year period. It emphasizes self-reliance and local production, ensuring the armed forces can address both traditional and non-traditional security challenges.

The broader implications of these policy changes are profound. They not only improve operational readiness but also strengthen civilian oversight. Enhanced accountability mechanisms ensure that the armed forces remain aligned with democratic principles.

Another key reform is the establishment of new oversight institutions. These bodies monitor defense spending and operational conduct, fostering greater transparency. Such measures are critical in maintaining public trust and ensuring that resources are used effectively.

However, implementing these reforms comes with challenges. Financial constraints and bureaucratic hurdles can slow progress. Despite these obstacles, the commitment to modernizing the armed forces remains strong.

In conclusion, recent legislative reforms and policy changes are transforming the armed forces. By enhancing transparency and accountability, these updates ensure that the armed forces can meet modern security demands while upholding democratic values.

Future Directions: Shaping Political Development through Military Engagement

Looking ahead, the armed forces are poised to play a transformative role in the Philippines’ political development. Strategic forecasts suggest that their involvement will evolve to address both traditional and emerging challenges. This shift reflects a broader trend toward adapting to rapidly changing political and defense landscapes.

One key area of focus is the integration of advanced technologies. Experts predict that the armed forces will increasingly leverage digital tools to enhance operational efficiency. For example, cybersecurity measures and data analytics could become central to their strategies, ensuring they remain effective in a tech-driven world.

Policy analysts emphasize the importance of proactive engagement. By fostering collaboration between the armed forces and civilian institutions, the Philippines can strengthen its governance framework. This approach aligns with international models, such as the U.S., where military-civilian partnerships have proven effective in addressing complex challenges.

Visionary ideas from defense strategists highlight the need for continuous adaptation. “The future of security lies in flexibility and innovation,” notes a leading expert. This perspective underscores the importance of investing in training programs that prepare personnel for diverse roles, from disaster response to counter-terrorism.

• Advanced technologies will redefine operational strategies.
• Proactive engagement can enhance governance and stability.
• Training programs must evolve to meet future demands.

Comparative insights from the U.S. offer valuable lessons. For instance, the integration of cyber defense units and specialized training programs has strengthened their capabilities. The Philippines can draw from these practices while tailoring them to local needs, ensuring relevance in its unique context.

Ultimately, the armed forces’ role in shaping political development will depend on their ability to adapt. By embracing innovation and fostering collaboration, they can contribute to a more stable and secure home for all Filipinos. This forward-thinking approach ensures that the Philippines remains resilient in the face of future challenges.

Contemporary Challenges Facing the Armed Forces and Political Institutions

Modern challenges demand innovative solutions from both armed forces and political institutions. The Philippines faces a complex landscape of security threats, budgetary constraints, and public scrutiny. These issues directly impact operational efficiency and political stability.

One major challenge is modernization. Outdated infrastructures and limited resources hinder the ability to address emerging threats. For example, recent reports highlight the need for advanced technologies in cybersecurity and disaster response. Without these upgrades, readiness remains compromised.

Budgetary constraints further exacerbate these issues. Balancing defense spending with other national priorities, such as education and healthcare, is a delicate task. Recent data shows that increased defense allocations can stimulate job creation but may limit investments in critical sectors.

Public scrutiny also plays a significant role. Media coverage often amplifies both achievements and controversies, shaping public opinion. For instance, investigative reports on operational setbacks have led to calls for greater transparency and accountability.

These challenges affect not only the armed forces but also civilian stakeholders. The life of service members and their families is directly impacted by resource limitations and operational pressures. Similarly, political institutions must navigate these hurdles to maintain public trust.

Strategic adaptation is crucial. By investing in modernization and fostering transparency, the Philippines can address these challenges effectively. This approach ensures that national interests are safeguarded while advancing necessary reforms.

In conclusion, contemporary challenges require a balanced approach. Addressing modernization, budgetary constraints, and public scrutiny is essential for enhancing readiness and stability. By doing so, the Philippines can build a more secure and resilient future for all.

Conclusion

The evolving role of the armed forces in the Philippines continues to shape the nation’s political and security landscape. From historical milestones to modern challenges, their influence remains a cornerstone of governance and stability.

This article explored the historical legacy of the armed forces, their impact on policy-making, and the contemporary challenges they face. Issues like modernization, budgetary constraints, and public scrutiny highlight the need for continuous adaptation.

As the Philippines navigates complex security threats, the importance of informed public discourse cannot be overstated. Ongoing reforms and training developments are crucial for addressing emerging trends and ensuring readiness.

Looking ahead, the armed forces must remain agile in a rapidly changing world. By fostering collaboration and leveraging advanced technologies, they can continue to safeguard the nation’s water resources and overall security.

For those interested in deeper insights, exploring related topics will provide a broader understanding of this critical subject. Continuous learning and analysis are essential for shaping a resilient future.

Source Links

• Philippines: is giving the military policing powers the answer? | ICJ
• Military history of the Philippines during the Marcos dictatorship
• Rebuilding Democratic Institutions: Civil–Military Relations in Philippine Democratic Governance – GSDRC
• Armed Forces of the Philippines
• Brief History
• Politics of the Philippines
• Philippines: Country Profile
• No title found
• How Has the Joint Readiness Training Center Changed to…
• The case for rethinking the politicization of the military
• Civilian Control of the Military: A “Useful Fiction”?
• Exploring the Nexus of Military and Society at a 50-Year Milestone
• Dynamic Intersection of Military and Society
• The Military and Political Intervention: Ideological Trends and Con…
• The use of military diplomacy in great power competition
• Policy Objective of Military Intervention and Public Attitudes: A Conjoint Experiment from US and Turkey – Political Behavior
• Military Units: Army
• Chain of Command – Military Hierarchy
• Military organization
• National Security Strategy
• The National Security Strategy of the United States of America
• Understanding National Security Strategies Through Time – Texas National Security Review
• How Military Spending Affects the Economy
• The Effects of Military Spending on Economic Growth – War Prevention Initiative
• How Does Defense Spending Affect Economic Growth?
• Military education and training
• Developing Military Training and Education Professionals
• Human Resources Specialist (Military) Career Path Guide
• Path for Army Officers
• From the military to the workforce: How to leverage veterans’ skills
• Current Issue – Comparative Connections
• Colonizing Workers: Labor, Race, and U.S. Military Governance in the Southern Philippines | Modern American History | Cambridge Core
• Social Media and the Armed Forces
• The Military and Private Business Actors in the Global South: The Politics of Market Access
• PDF
• Protecting Schools from Military Use
• Limiting the Military’s Role in Law Enforcement
• How great powers shape the world
• PDF
• Contemporary Warfare and Current Issues for the Defense of the Country
• Contemporary challenges in the civil-military relationship: Complementarity or incompatibility?
• Philippines and U.S. conclude Balikatan exercises, shoulder-to-shoulder
• NATO Leaders Stress Unity at Conclusion of Defense Ministerial
• Conclusion: Scoring the Global Operating Environment