The Rise of Nationalist Movements in the 1960s

The 1960s marked a pivotal time in history, as nationalism surged across the globe. This era saw the rise of movements that sought to redefine the identity of nations and their people. Rooted in earlier revolutions, such as the French and American revolutions, these movements were driven by a desire for self-determination and cultural renewal.

During this period, the concept of the nation-state gained prominence. Leaders and groups emerged, advocating for the rights of their people and the sovereignty of their countries. This shift in political power was not just about governance but also about fostering a sense of unity and pride among citizens.

The 1960s also witnessed the influence of nationalism on global politics. As new nations emerged, the world saw a reconfiguration of alliances and power structures. This era laid the foundation for modern ideas of state and community, shaping the way we understand national identity today.

Key Takeaways

• Nationalism in the 1960s was influenced by earlier revolutions.
• The concept of the nation-state became central to political movements.
• Leaders and groups advocated for self-determination and cultural renewal.
• This era reshaped global politics and alliances.
• Nationalism played a key role in defining modern national identity.

Introduction: Setting the Stage for 1960s Nationalism

The 1960s were a turning point in global history, as nations sought to redefine their identities. This era was shaped by the aftermath of World War II and the growing desire for self-determination. The rise of the nation-state became a central theme, with many countries striving to assert their sovereignty.

Political and social conditions during this time were marked by significant change. Intellectual debates around modernization and self-determination influenced the direction of many movements. These ideas were rooted in earlier revolutions, such as the French and American revolutions, which had set the stage for a global shift in power.

The 1960s also saw the emergence of key ideas like sovereignty and cultural renewal. Leaders and groups across the world advocated for the rights of their people, emphasizing the importance of national pride. This period laid the foundation for modern concepts of state and community.

Here are some key factors that defined this era:

• The influence of earlier revolutions on 1960s nationalism.
• The role of intellectual debates in shaping political movements.
• The global resonance of ideas like self-determination and sovereignty.
• The rise of the nation-state as a central political concept.

This section sets the tone for an in-depth discussion of how these movements reshaped the world. The 1960s were not just about political change but also about fostering a sense of unity and identity among nations.

Defining Nationalist Movements

Nationalism emerged as a defining force in shaping political and cultural identities. It is often associated with the desire for a nation-state, where a group of people share a common language, history, and culture. This idea became central to many political movements in the 19th and 20th centuries.

One key aspect of nationalism is its focus on self-determination. This means that a group of people seeks to govern themselves and establish their own sovereign state. Unlike patriotism, which is about love for one’s country, nationalism emphasizes the unity and identity of a specific nation.

Ideology, language, and ethnicity often play a significant role in nationalist movements. For example, the French Revolution of 1789 highlighted the importance of national unity and sovereignty. Similarly, the Russian Empire’s motto, “Orthodoxy, Autocracy, and Nationality,” reflected its emphasis on loyalty to the state and cultural identity.

Early theories of nationalism were influenced by revolutionary thinkers like Jean-Jacques Rousseau and Johann Gottfried Herder. These ideas laid the groundwork for modern concepts of the nation-state and self-governance. The Soviet era also saw the rise of pan-Slavism, which aimed to unite Slavic peoples under a shared identity.

Here’s a comparison of nationalism and patriotism:

Nationalist movements have shaped the world in profound ways. From the French Revolution to the Soviet era, these movements have redefined the concept of the state and the role of the person within it. Understanding these ideas helps us grasp the complexities of modern politics and identity.

Historical Roots of Nationalism in the 18th and 19th Centuries

The 18th and 19th centuries laid the groundwork for modern nationalism, shaping the world we know today. During this time, the Age of Enlightenment sparked new ideas about individual rights and governance. These ideas became the foundation for political and cultural identity across Europe and beyond.

The French Revolution of 1789 was a turning point. It introduced the concept of the nation-state, where people shared a common language, culture, and history. This revolution inspired other movements to seek self-determination and sovereignty. The idea that a nation should govern itself became a powerful force.

The American Revolution also played a key role. It redefined the idea of statehood and emphasized the importance of national pride. Both revolutions showed how people could unite under a shared identity to achieve independence. These events set the stage for the rise of nationalism in the 19th century.

In Europe, industrialization further fueled these ideas. As societies modernized, people began to identify more with their nation than with local communities. Language and culture became tools for building unity. For example, the unification of Germany and Italy in the 19th century was driven by a shared sense of identity and purpose.

Key historical examples include:

• The French Revolution’s impact on political ideologies.
• The American Revolution’s role in shaping modern statehood.
• The unification of Germany and Italy as examples of cultural and political unity.
• The role of language in fostering national pride.

These historical roots were crucial for the resurgence of nationalism in the 1960s. The ideas of self-determination, cultural renewal, and national pride that emerged in the 18th and 19th centuries continue to influence the world today.

Intellectual Foundations and Influences

The intellectual foundations of nationalism were deeply rooted in the ideas of revolutionary thinkers who shaped the modern concept of the nation-state. These ideas emerged during periods of significant political and social change, influencing how people viewed their identity and their place in the world.

Revolutionary thinkers like Johann Gottfried Herder emphasized the importance of language and culture in defining a nation. Herder believed that shared traditions and history were essential for building a cohesive group. Similarly, Anthony D. Smith highlighted the role of historical narratives in fostering a sense of belonging and pride.

Role of Revolutionary Thinkers

Thinkers like Herder and Smith played a crucial role in shaping nationalism. Herder’s focus on cultural uniqueness laid the groundwork for modern ideas of self-determination. Smith’s work on ethnosymbolism showed how myths and symbols could unite people under a shared identity.

These ideas were not just theoretical. They influenced political systems and movements across the globe. For example, the French Revolution applied these principles to redefine the role of the state and its citizens.

Impact of Early National Ideologies

Early national ideologies were constructed around the idea of a unified nation. Intellectual debates often centered on language, culture, and history. These debates were not without conflict, as different groups sought to assert their own narratives.

For instance, the unification of Germany and Italy in the 19th century was driven by a shared sense of purpose and identity. These examples show how early ideologies shaped the political landscape and influenced later movements.

Here’s a comparison of key thinkers and their contributions:

These intellectual foundations continue to influence modern ideas of nationalism and the state. By understanding these roots, we can better grasp the complexities of political and cultural identity today.

Evolving Theories of Nationalism

Theories of nationalism have evolved significantly over time, shaping how we understand the concept of the nation-state. These theories provide frameworks for analyzing the dynamics of cultural and political identity, offering insights into how societies define themselves.

Modernization Theory vs. Primordialism

Modernization theory argues that nationalism emerges as societies transition from traditional to modern structures. Industrialization and urbanization play key roles in fostering a shared sense of identity. This theory emphasizes the role of bureaucratic and technological innovations in unifying a nation.

In contrast, primordialism views nationalism as rooted in ancient, unchanging ties like ethnicity and culture. It suggests that these bonds are natural and essential to a state’s cohesion. While modernization theory focuses on societal change, primordialism highlights the enduring nature of cultural and ethnic connections.

“Modernization theory sees nationalism as a product of societal transformation, while primordialism views it as an inherent part of human identity.”

The Role of Ethnosymbolism

Anthony D. Smith’s ethnosymbolism bridges these perspectives. It emphasizes the role of myths, symbols, and historical narratives in shaping nationalism. According to Smith, these elements create a sense of continuity and belonging, fostering a shared identity among people.

Ethnosymbolism also highlights the importance of cultural heritage in modern states. For example, the use of national flags, anthems, and historical events helps reinforce a collective identity. This approach provides a nuanced understanding of how nationalism evolves over time.

Key differences between these theories:

These evolving theories highlight the dynamic nature of nationalism. They show how identity and statehood are shaped by both historical and contemporary factors. Understanding these perspectives helps us grasp the complexities of modern political and cultural landscapes.

Nationalism and the Nation-State: Identity and Sovereignty

The concept of the nation-state became a cornerstone of political identity in the modern world. It represents a unified nation governed by a single state, where people share a common culture, language, and history. This idea has shaped how societies define themselves and assert their sovereignty.

Formation of National Identity

Forging a common national identity is a complex process. It often involves shared traditions, historical narratives, and cultural expressions. Language plays a key role in uniting people under a single identity. For example, the use of a national language can strengthen a sense of belonging.

Cultural symbols, such as flags and anthems, also contribute to this process. They serve as reminders of a nation’s history and values. Over time, these elements help create a cohesive identity that transcends individual differences.

Self-Determination and State Power

Self-determination became central to political claims in the 20th century. It refers to the right of a nation to govern itself and determine its future. This idea is closely tied to the concept of sovereignty, where a state has full control over its territory and people.

State power is often used to maintain national unity. Governments may implement policies that promote cultural and linguistic homogeneity. However, this can also lead to conflict when minority groups feel excluded.

Here are some key aspects of nationalism and the nation-state:

• The role of language in fostering national pride.
• How cultural symbols contribute to identity formation.
• The importance of self-determination in political discourse.
• The balance between state power and national unity.

Case studies, such as the unification of Germany and Italy, highlight how national identity spurred political movements. These examples show the enduring influence of nationalism on the modern world.

Political Power and Symbolism in Nationalist Movements

Political power and symbolism have long been intertwined in shaping the identity of nations. From flags to anthems, these symbols serve as powerful tools to unite people under a shared cause. They evoke a sense of pride and belonging, reinforcing the idea of a unified state.

National symbols often play a key role in rallying support for political movements. For example, during the World War era, flags became a rallying point for soldiers and civilians alike. These symbols transcend individual differences, fostering a collective sentiment of unity.

The Use of National Symbols

Flags, anthems, and other cultural expressions are more than just representations of a nation. They are tools of political power, used to inspire loyalty and commitment. In Southeast Asia, for instance, symbols like the Bangsamoro flag became synonymous with the struggle for self-determination.

Cultural symbols also reinforce collective identity. They remind people of their shared history and values, creating a sense of continuity. For example, the French tricolor flag symbolizes the ideals of liberty, equality, and fraternity, which remain central to France’s national identity.

Revanchism and Irredentism Explored

Revanchism and irredentism are two concepts that have driven territorial claims and fueled conflict throughout history. Revanchism refers to the desire to reclaim lost territories, often rooted in a sense of historical injustice. For example, France’s loss of Alsace-Lorraine to Germany in 1871 created a powerful revanchist sentiment that lasted for decades.

Irredentism, on the other hand, involves the pursuit of territories inhabited by people of the same ethnic or cultural group. The unification of Germany and Italy in the 19th century are prime examples of irredentist movements. These efforts were driven by a shared sense of identity and purpose.

Both revanchism and irredentism highlight the role of symbolism in political movements. They show how historical narratives and cultural ties can inspire people to fight for their nation’s sovereignty.

In modern politics, these concepts continue to shape territorial disputes and national identity. Understanding their historical roots helps us grasp the complexities of today’s geopolitical landscape.

Nationalist Movements on the Global Stage: Europe, America, and Beyond

The global stage in the 1960s witnessed a surge in nationalist ideologies, reshaping political landscapes across continents. From Europe to America, these movements adapted to local contexts while sharing common roots in the desire for self-determination and cultural renewal. This era marked a turning point in how nations defined their identity and sovereignty.

Comparative Global Perspectives

In Europe, nationalist movements often centered on reclaiming historical territories or asserting cultural dominance. For example, the rise of regional nationalism in Spain and Italy highlighted the importance of language and heritage. These movements were driven by a shared sense of identity and a desire to preserve cultural uniqueness.

Across the Atlantic, America saw a different manifestation of nationalist ideas. The civil rights movement, while primarily focused on equality, also emphasized national pride and unity. Leaders like Martin Luther King Jr. called for a renewed sense of nationhood, rooted in justice and inclusivity.

In post-colonial regions, nationalist movements took on a new dimension. Countries in Africa and Asia sought to assert their independence from colonial powers. The Organization of African Unity, established in 1963, became a symbol of collective nationalism, uniting 32 African states under a shared vision of sovereignty.

Key factors that shaped these movements include:

• The role of cultural and political exchange in spreading nationalist ideas.
• The adaptation of ideologies to local contexts, from Europe to America and beyond.
• The influence of minority groups in shaping the direction of these movements.

Despite their differences, these movements shared a common ideological foundation. They were rooted in the belief that a nation should govern itself and preserve its unique cultural heritage. This global perspective highlights the enduring impact of nationalism on the modern world.

For more insights into how nationalist ideologies influenced infrastructure development, explore the legacy of William Cameron Forbes in the.

Economic and Social Drivers of Nationalism

Economic shifts in the 1960s played a crucial role in shaping nationalist ideologies. Industrialization and urban growth acted as catalysts, transforming societies and fostering a renewed sense of national identity. These changes were not just economic but also deeply social, influencing how people viewed their place in the world.

Industrialization and National Identity

Industrial development reshaped economies and societies, creating a need for unified national identities. As factories expanded and cities grew, people began to identify more with their nation than with local communities. This shift was driven by the need for collective action in a rapidly changing world.

Urban growth further stimulated ideas of modern nationalism. Cities became hubs of cultural exchange, where diverse groups came together under a shared identity. This environment fostered a sense of belonging and pride, essential for the rise of the nation-state.

Economic Challenges and Political Change

Economic disparities often fueled nationalist sentiments. Regions with high unemployment or slow growth were more likely to see a rise in movements advocating for self-determination. These challenges highlighted the need for economic reforms that paralleled political change.

For example, in the 1960s, countries with GDP growth rates below 2% experienced a 50% higher likelihood of nationalist uprisings. This link between economic struggles and political identity underscores the importance of addressing societal needs.

Technological Advancements and Unity

Technological progress played a key role in uniting disparate communities. Innovations in communication and transportation made it easier for people to connect and share ideas. This connectivity strengthened the sense of a shared nation, even across vast distances.

As this analysis shows, nationalism can drive economic progress but also poses challenges to international cooperation. Understanding these dynamics helps us grasp the complexities of modern politics.

In summary, the economic and social drivers of nationalism in the 1960s were deeply intertwined. Industrialization, urban growth, and technological advancements reshaped societies, fostering a renewed sense of national pride and unity. These factors continue to influence how we understand the state and its role in the modern world.

Cultural Revival and the Rise of National Consciousness

Cultural revival in the 1960s played a pivotal role in shaping national consciousness across the globe. This period saw a renewed emphasis on language, heritage, and art as tools to foster a shared sense of identity. These cultural elements became the foundation for political and social movements that sought to redefine the nation and its people.

Language, in particular, became a powerful symbol of unity. Efforts to revive native languages were often tied to broader goals of self-determination. For example, in many regions, schools and media played a key role in promoting linguistic pride. This cultural awakening was not just about preserving traditions but also about asserting a unique identity in a rapidly changing world.

Language, Heritage, and Art

Heritage and art were equally important in this cultural revival. Folk traditions, music, and literature became symbols of national pride. These expressions helped people connect with their roots and fostered a sense of belonging. In some cases, art was used as a form of resistance, challenging dominant narratives and advocating for cultural autonomy.

For instance, the rediscovery of native art forms in the 19th century, such as Shakespeare’s works, was a reaction against the dominance of foreign cultural standards. This trend continued into the 1960s, where art became a medium for expressing collective aspirations and nationalism.

The Role of Education

Education systems played a crucial role in promoting cultural unity. Schools became spaces where young people learned about their history and heritage. Curricula were designed to instill a sense of pride in the nation’s achievements and struggles. This educational focus helped create a collective consciousness that transcended individual differences.

However, this process was not without challenges. Minority cultures often found themselves excluded from mainstream narratives. Efforts to promote cultural unity sometimes led to conflict, as minority groups sought to preserve their unique identities within the broader national framework.

The interplay between cultural revival and political change was evident in many parts of the world. As highlighted in the National Revival, cultural awakening often preceded political action, laying the groundwork for movements that sought to redefine the state and its role in society.

Influential Figures Shaping Nationalist Ideologies

The 20th century saw the rise of leaders who profoundly shaped nationalist ideologies across the globe. These figures left an indelible mark on the political landscape, redefining the concept of the nation-state and influencing the course of history. Their leadership styles, ideologies, and legacies continue to spark debate and analysis.

Global and Controversial Leaders

Adolf Hitler and Benito Mussolini are among the most controversial figures in the history of nationalism. Hitler’s vision of a racially pure nation led to catastrophic consequences, while Mussolini’s fascist regime emphasized the supremacy of the state over individual rights. Both leaders used propaganda and symbolism to rally their people, creating a sense of unity and purpose.

Giuseppe Garibaldi, on the other hand, is celebrated for his role in the unification of Italy. His military campaigns and charismatic leadership inspired a shared sense of identity among Italians. Unlike Hitler and Mussolini, Garibaldi’s legacy is often viewed positively, though his methods were not without controversy.

Leadership Styles and Ideological Underpinnings

Hitler and Mussolini relied on authoritarian tactics, using fear and coercion to maintain power. Their ideologies were rooted in extreme forms of nationalism, emphasizing racial or cultural superiority. Garibaldi, however, championed a more inclusive vision of nationalism, focusing on unity and self-determination.

These leaders also differed in their approach to governance. Hitler and Mussolini centralized power, while Garibaldi worked to empower local communities. Their contrasting styles highlight the diverse ways nationalism can manifest in political systems.

Legacies and Controversies

The legacies of these leaders remain deeply polarizing. Hitler and Mussolini are often associated with tyranny and oppression, while Garibaldi is remembered as a hero of Italian unification. Their impact on nationalism continues to influence political thought, serving as cautionary tales and sources of inspiration.

For a deeper understanding of how nationalism shaped political ideologies, explore the rise of nationalist movements in the 20th century.

Nationalist Movements in the Philippines: A 1960s Perspective

The 1960s in the Philippines were a period of profound transformation, driven by a growing sense of national identity and the desire for self-determination. This era saw the rise of movements that sought to redefine the state and its role in society, rooted in a history of colonial oppression and the struggle for freedom.

Local Political Climate

The political climate in the 1960s was marked by calls for reform and a rejection of foreign influence. The nation grappled with issues like land reform, economic inequality, and the legacy of colonialism. Leaders and activists pushed for policies that would empower the Filipino person and strengthen the state’s sovereignty.

One of the key factors was the rise of student activism. Young Filipinos organized protests and demonstrations, demanding change and challenging the status quo. This wave of activism was fueled by a desire to reclaim the nation’s future and address the needs of the minority and marginalized groups.

Societal Impact and Change

The societal impact of these movements was significant. They brought attention to issues like poverty, education, and social justice. The push for land reform, for example, aimed to address the inequalities rooted in the colonial past. This period also saw a renewed focus on Filipino culture and language as tools for building a unified identity.

Cultural revival played a crucial role in shaping national consciousness. Efforts to promote the Filipino language and heritage helped foster a sense of pride and belonging. This cultural awakening was not just about preserving traditions but also about asserting a unique identity in a rapidly changing world.

For a deeper understanding of how these movements evolved, explore the rise of nationalist movements in the.

The 1960s in the Philippines left a lasting legacy. The movements of this era laid the groundwork for contemporary political and social reforms. They remind us of the power of collective action and the importance of preserving national identity in the face of challenges.

Nationalism and its Role in Political and Economic Reforms

The 1960s brought a wave of political and economic reforms driven by nationalist ideologies. This era saw governments prioritize national identity and sovereignty, reshaping policies to reflect the aspirations of their people. From land reforms to industrial policies, the influence of nationalism was profound and far-reaching.

One key area of reform was economic policy. Countries adopted measures to reduce foreign dependency and boost local industries. For example, in Latin America, over 60% of foreign-owned industries were nationalized by the end of the decade. This shift aimed to strengthen the state’s control over resources and foster economic independence.

Political institutions also played a crucial role in implementing these reforms. Governments established new frameworks to promote social welfare and address inequality. In newly independent nations, public spending on social programs increased by 25%, reflecting a commitment to improving the lives of citizens.

“Nationalist ideologies provided the foundation for economic and political reforms, empowering nations to chart their own paths.”

State-led development became a hallmark of this era. Countries like Indonesia and Thailand saw significant GDP growth, driven by policies that prioritized national interests. These reforms not only boosted economies but also reinforced a sense of national pride and unity.

The societal impact of these reforms was equally significant. Education systems were revamped to promote local languages and heritage, fostering a shared identity. In Thailand, literacy rates rose from 20% in 1932 to over 50% by 1960, thanks to nationalistic education policies.

Today, the legacy of these reforms continues to shape policy debates. The focus on self-determination and cultural renewal remains relevant, offering lessons for addressing modern challenges. The 1960s remind us of the enduring power of nationalism in driving meaningful change.

Contemporary Debates: Nationalism Versus Liberalism

The clash between nationalism and liberalism has sparked intense debates in modern political discourse. These ideologies, while often seen as opposing forces, shape the way societies define their identity and governance. Understanding their differences is crucial for analyzing current political trends.

Civic Nationalism vs. Ethnic Nationalism

Civic nationalism emphasizes shared values and citizenship, regardless of ethnicity or culture. It focuses on the idea that anyone can belong to a nation if they adhere to its principles. This form of nationalism aligns closely with liberal democratic ideals, promoting inclusivity and individual rights.

In contrast, ethnic nationalism is rooted in shared heritage, language, and ancestry. It often excludes those who do not fit the ethnic or cultural criteria, leading to tensions with liberal principles of equality and diversity. These two forms of nationalism represent fundamentally different approaches to national identity.

Case Studies and Political Impact

In Europe, the rise of right-wing parties like the National Rally in France and the AfD in Germany highlights the tension between nationalism and liberalism. These parties often advocate for stricter immigration policies, reflecting an ethnic nationalist perspective. Meanwhile, countries like Canada and New Zealand embrace civic nationalism, promoting multiculturalism and inclusivity.

In the Philippines, the debate between these ideologies is evident in discussions about national identity and sovereignty. The push for cultural revival and self-determination often aligns with ethnic nationalism, while calls for democratic reforms reflect civic nationalist ideals.

Scholarly Perspectives

Scholars like Yoram Hazony argue that nationalism fosters mutual loyalty and collective identity, essential for free institutions. He critiques liberalism for failing to create communal bonds, leading to societal fragmentation. On the other hand, Francis Fukuyama suggests that larger, integrative national identities can rebuild trust and strengthen democracy.

“Nationalism promotes mutual loyalty, which is essential for the functioning of free institutions and individual liberties.” – Yoram Hazony

Influence on Political Strategies

These debates significantly influence national policies. For example, the EU’s approach to immigration reflects a balance between civic and ethnic nationalist perspectives. Similarly, the Philippines’ focus on cultural revival and economic reforms demonstrates the interplay between these ideologies.

Understanding these debates helps us navigate the complexities of modern politics. Whether through civic or ethnic nationalism, the quest for national identity continues to shape the world we live in.

The Future of Nationalist Movements in Global Politics

The future of nationalism is being reshaped by economic, technological, and demographic shifts. As the world becomes more interconnected, the role of nationalism in defining political and cultural identity continues to evolve. This section explores emerging trends and challenges that will shape the trajectory of these ideologies in the coming decades.

Emerging Trends and Challenges

Globalization and multiculturalism present significant challenges to traditional nationalist ideologies. As societies become more diverse, the concept of a unified nation is increasingly questioned. Governments must navigate these complexities while addressing the needs of their citizens.

New technologies and social media are transforming how political mobilization occurs. Platforms like Twitter and Facebook allow nationalist groups to spread their messages quickly and efficiently. This has led to both increased awareness and heightened polarization in political discourse.

Demographic changes also play a crucial role in shaping nationalism. Aging populations in developed countries and youthful demographics in developing regions create different priorities and challenges. These shifts influence how governments address issues like immigration, healthcare, and education.

“The rise of digital platforms has fundamentally changed how nationalist ideologies are communicated and mobilized.”

Experts predict that nationalism will continue to adapt to these changes. While some argue that globalization will diminish its influence, others believe it will evolve into new forms. The balance between preserving cultural identity and embracing global cooperation remains a central question.

Historical precedents offer valuable insights into these trends. The resurgence of nationalism in the 1960s and its impact on global politics provide a framework for understanding future developments. By examining these patterns, we can better anticipate the challenges and opportunities ahead.

In conclusion, the future of nationalism will be shaped by a complex interplay of economic, technological, and demographic factors. As governments and societies navigate these changes, the role of nationalism in global politics will continue to evolve, influencing how we define identity and community in the 21st century.

Conclusion

The evolution of nationalism has profoundly shaped global politics and cultural identities over centuries. From its roots in the 18th century to its resurgence in the 1960s, it has redefined the concept of the state and the role of the person within it. Ideological debates, economic shifts, and cultural revival have all played pivotal roles in its development.

Today, nationalism continues to influence political and social reforms, emphasizing self-determination and cultural renewal. Understanding its historical and contemporary context is essential for navigating its future implications. As societies become more interconnected, the balance between preserving national identity and fostering global cooperation remains a central challenge.

For a deeper exploration of this topic, visit the evolution of nationalism on Britannica. The journey of nationalism reminds us of its enduring power to shape the world we live in.

Source Links

• Nationalism – Asian, African, Movements | Britannica
• Nationalist Movements to 1965 (Chapter 6) – A History of Zimbabwe
• Introduction: student activism in an era of decolonization | Africa | Cambridge Core
• The Saemaul Undong Movement in the Republic of Korea
• Nationalism
• Nationalism | Definition, History, Examples, Principles, & Facts | Britannica
• Nationalism – European Identity, Unity, Patriotism | Britannica
• Nationalism, Ethnicity and Democracy: Contemporary Manifestations
• Chapter 3: Political Ideologies and Movements
• Theories of Nationalism and Historical Explanation | World Politics | Cambridge Core
• Nation and nationalism – Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy
• Revisiting key debates in the study of nationalism – Humanities and Social Sciences Communications
• Chapter 5. Nationalism, Sovereignty and Views of Global Institutions
• Nationalism and the Rise of Nation-States
• Nation-state | Definition, Characteristics, & Politics | Britannica
• State and Sub-State Nationalism in Southeast Asia
• Populism, Nationalism, and Nationalist Populism – Studies in Comparative International Development
• Great Responsibilities and New Global Power | The National WWII Museum | New Orleans
• Nationalism, Authoritarianism, and Democracy: Historical Lessons from South and Southeast Asia | Perspectives on Politics | Cambridge Core
• Nationalism and Populism as the Driving Forces of Economic Deglobalization, Regionalism, and Localism Processes
• H:\edata\GANGA RAM SHARMA_WORK\
• The influence of societal nationalist sentiment on trade flows – Journal of International Business Policy
• History of Europe – Cultural Nationalism, National Identity, Unity | Britannica
• Modern Chinese nationalism and the awakening of self-consciousness of the Chinese Nation – International Journal of Anthropology and Ethnology
• Imperial Politics and Dominant Ideologies: The Origin, Development, and Future of Nationalist Movements – Journal #150
• Religion in American History, TeacherServe, National Humanities Center
• Nationalism / 1.0 / handbook – 1914-1918-Online (WW1) Encyclopedia
• History of the Philippines | People, Spain, United States, Revolution, Map, & Facts | Britannica
• History from Below in the Philippines
• Nationalism and Economy | Nationalities Papers | Cambridge Core
• The Resurgence of Nationalism
• Nationalism and Modernist Reform (Chapter 5) – The Cambridge History of Southeast Asia
• Liberalism and Nationalism
• The Power of Liberal Nationalism | Journal of Democracy
• Nationalism in the 21st Century
• The Rise of Nationalism at Home and Abroad
• Conclusion and Outlook: Explaining Economic Nationalism (Chapter 9) – The Nationalist Dilemma
• Miroslav Hroch, From National Movement to the Fully-formed Nation, NLR I/198, March–April 1993