The Impact of the Cold War on Philippine Politics

The Cold War reshaped global politics, and its effects were deeply felt in the Philippines. As the United States and the Soviet Union vied for influence, the Philippines became a strategic battleground. This geopolitical rivalry influenced local political realignments and shaped the nation’s governance for decades.

During this period, the Philippines strengthened its alliance with the United States. Defense pacts and economic aid played a crucial role in shaping the country’s political landscape. Meanwhile, the threat of communism led to significant internal reforms and military strategies.

Understanding this history helps explain modern Philippine politics. The legacy of the Cold War continues to influence the nation’s foreign policy and domestic governance. By examining these events, we gain insight into the Philippines’ unique political trajectory.

Key Takeaways

• The Cold War significantly influenced Philippine politics.
• The United States and Soviet Union played key roles in shaping the nation’s alliances.
• Defense pacts and economic aid were critical during this period.
• The threat of communism led to internal reforms and military strategies.
• The legacy of the Cold War continues to impact modern governance.

Historical Context of the Global Cold War Era

The post-World War II era marked the beginning of a new global power struggle. The United States and the Soviet Union emerged as dominant superpowers, each promoting opposing ideologies. This rivalry set the stage for decades of tension and conflict.

Europe became a focal point of this divide. The concept of the Iron Curtain, introduced by Winston Churchill, symbolized the separation between the democratic West and the communist East. Germany was split into two nations, with Berlin itself divided by a wall.

The Truman Doctrine and the Marshall Plan were pivotal in shaping this era. The doctrine aimed to contain communism, while the plan provided economic aid to rebuild war-torn Europe. These efforts solidified the United States’ role as a global leader.

Early conflicts, such as the Berlin Blockade and the Korean War, highlighted the intensity of this rivalry. Proxy wars became a common strategy, with both superpowers supporting opposing sides in smaller nations. These events laid the groundwork for the broader Cold War dynamics.

Understanding this historical context is essential to grasp the global influences that shaped later regional developments. The division of Europe, the rise of superpowers, and the ideological battle all played a role in defining the 20th century.

The Genesis of the Post-World War II Superpower Rivalry

The aftermath of World War II set the stage for a new era of global tension and rivalry. The United States and the Soviet Union emerged as dominant forces, each promoting opposing ideologies. This ideological divide laid the foundation for decades of conflict and competition.

Origins and Early Tensions

Immediately after World War II, alliances began to shift. The United States and the Soviet Union, once allies against Nazi Germany, found themselves at odds. The Soviet Union sought to expand its influence in Eastern Europe, while the United States aimed to promote democracy and capitalism.

This ideological clash led to early tensions. The Soviet Union established control over several Eastern European nations, creating a buffer zone. Meanwhile, the United States responded with policies designed to counter Soviet expansion.

The Role of the Truman Doctrine and Marshall Plan

In 1947, President Harry Truman introduced the Truman Doctrine. This policy aimed to contain the spread of communism by providing economic and military aid to nations threatened by Soviet influence. It marked a significant shift in U.S. foreign policy.

Following the Truman Doctrine, the Marshall Plan was launched in 1948. This initiative provided over $17 billion in economic aid to rebuild war-torn Europe. By strengthening European economies, the United States hoped to prevent the spread of communism.

These early events set the tone for the broader superpower rivalry. The United States and the Soviet Union engaged in a series of proxy conflicts, each seeking to expand their influence. These efforts shaped the global political landscape for decades to come.

Dynamics of U.S. and Soviet Rivalry

The rivalry between the United States and the Soviet Union defined global politics for decades. This period was marked by an intense arms race and strategic diplomatic maneuvers. Both superpowers sought to outmatch each other, leading to significant global tensions.

An Arms Race and Diplomatic Maneuvers

The arms race became a defining feature of this rivalry. Both nations invested heavily in military technology, particularly nuclear weapons. The Soviet Union’s first nuclear test in 1949 intensified the competition. This escalation led to the doctrine of mutually assured destruction, where both sides aimed to deter conflict through the threat of total annihilation.

Diplomatic efforts were equally critical. Summits between leaders, such as the Reykjavik meeting in 1986, aimed to reduce tensions. However, events like the Cuban Missile Crisis in 1962 highlighted the fragility of these efforts. This crisis brought the world to the brink of nuclear war, underscoring the dangers of the arms race.

“We must seek to reduce the risk of war, not by limiting our ability to defend ourselves, but by engaging in meaningful dialogue.” – U.S. President during the Cold War

The Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces Treaty of 1987 was a significant milestone. It eliminated an entire class of missiles, showcasing the potential for diplomacy to mitigate risks. This treaty marked a turning point in U.S.-Soviet relations, paving the way for further agreements.

These dynamics influenced global security and foreign policies for years. The United States and the Soviet Union shaped international relations through their competition. Understanding this history provides insight into the complexities of modern geopolitics. For more on how global events influenced local politics, explore this link.

Cold War in Asia: Shifting Alliances and Regional Discord

Asia became a critical theater during the global rivalry between superpowers. The United States and the Soviet Union sought to expand their influence, leading to proxy wars and shifting alliances. This period saw significant conflicts that reshaped the region’s political landscape.

Proxy Wars and Policy of Containment

The policy of containment was central to U.S. strategy in Asia. Aimed at limiting the spread of communism, it led to direct involvement in conflicts like Korea and Vietnam. These wars were not just local struggles but part of a broader superpower competition.

In Korea, the division between North and South became a flashpoint. The United States supported the South, while the Soviet Union backed the North. This conflict highlighted the risks of regional discord and the lengths superpowers would go to protect their interests.

Vietnam became another battleground. The U.S. intervention aimed to prevent a communist takeover, but the war had lasting consequences. It strained U.S. resources and reshaped Southeast Asian governance.

These conflicts influenced political and military strategies across the region. Alliances shifted as nations sought to balance between superpowers. The legacy of these events continues to shape Asia’s political dynamics today.

Spread of Ideologies Amid Decolonization and Nationalism

The mid-20th century saw a wave of decolonization that reshaped global politics. As colonial empires crumbled, new nations in Asia, Africa, and Latin America emerged with distinct identities. This period was marked by the rise of nationalism, as people sought to define their own futures free from foreign control.

The United States and the Soviet Union seized this moment to spread their competing ideologies. Capitalism and communism became tools for influencing newly independent nations. These superpowers provided economic aid, military support, and political guidance to gain allies in the global arena.

Impact on Third World Political Trends

Nationalist movements often intersected with Cold War politics. Leaders in developing nations had to navigate between superpower influences while building their own governance structures. For example, Indonesia’s “bebas-aktif” (independent and active) foreign policy was a direct response to ideological competition.

In many cases, external pressures reshaped local political trends. The United States supported anti-communist regimes, while the Soviet Union backed revolutionary movements. This ideological struggle often destabilized regions, leading to prolonged conflicts and power struggles.

“The Cold War turned local struggles into global battlegrounds, where ideologies clashed over the future of nations.”

These global dynamics had indirect effects on domestic governance. Newly independent nations faced challenges in balancing internal unity with external pressures. The legacy of these struggles continues to shape political landscapes in developing countries today.

Direct Effects of the Cold War on Philippine Politics

The geopolitical tensions of the mid-20th century had a profound impact on Philippine politics. As the United States and the Soviet Union competed for global influence, the Philippines became a strategic battleground. This external pressure reshaped the nation’s military, economic, and political landscape.

Local Military Alliances and Economic Influences

The Philippines strengthened its ties with the United States during this period. Defense pacts, such as the Mutual Defense Treaty of 1951, ensured military support against potential threats. This alliance also brought significant economic aid, which helped rebuild the nation’s infrastructure.

American aid programs, like the Economic Cooperation Administration, provided resources for development. These initiatives not only boosted the economy but also reinforced the Philippines’ alignment with Western ideologies. The Soviet Union, meanwhile, sought to expand its influence through local communist movements.

Political Realignments and Policy Shifts

The global rivalry between superpowers led to significant political changes in the Philippines. The government implemented anti-communist policies to counter internal threats. This included the suppression of leftist groups and the reorganization of military strategies.

Domestic policies were also influenced by the need to maintain stability. The administration focused on economic reforms and social programs to address public discontent. These efforts were often supported by United States aid, which played a crucial role in shaping the nation’s governance.

“The Cold War turned local struggles into global battlegrounds, where ideologies clashed over the future of nations.”

• Defense pacts with the United States ensured military security.
• Economic aid programs supported infrastructure and development.
• Anti-communist policies reshaped domestic governance.
• Political realignments were driven by global superpower competition.

These changes highlight how external pressures during the Cold War directly influenced Philippine politics. The legacy of this era continues to shape the nation’s foreign policy and domestic governance today.

U.S.-Philippines Relations during the Cold War Era

The relationship between the United States and the Philippines during the mid-20th century was shaped by global superpower competition. As tensions between the United States and the Soviet Union escalated, the Philippines became a strategic partner in Southeast Asia. This alliance was cemented through defense pacts, military support, and economic aid.

Defense Pacts and Military Support

The Mutual Defense Treaty of 1951 was a cornerstone of U.S.-Philippines relations. This agreement ensured that both nations would support each other in case of an attack. The treaty strengthened the Philippines’ security and solidified its alignment with the United States.

Military bases, such as Clark Air Base and Subic Bay Naval Base, played a crucial role. These installations provided the United States with a strategic foothold in the region. In return, the Philippines received military aid and training, enhancing its defense capabilities.

Economic Aid and Strategic Partnerships

Economic assistance from the United States was vital for the Philippines’ post-war recovery. Programs like the Economic Cooperation Administration provided funds for infrastructure and development. This aid helped stabilize the Philippine economy and fostered goodwill between the two nations.

Strategic partnerships extended beyond military and economic ties. The United States supported the Philippines in international forums, reinforcing its position in global politics. These efforts were part of a broader strategy to counter Soviet influence in Asia.

These agreements and partnerships highlight the depth of U.S.-Philippines relations during the Cold War. The legacy of this era continues to influence bilateral ties and regional security policies today.

Soviet Ideology Versus Local Political Currents

The ideological clash between the Soviet Union and the United States reshaped political movements globally. In the Philippines, this rivalry sparked the emergence of local communist groups, deeply influencing the nation’s political landscape. The spread of Soviet political thought challenged traditional parties and introduced new dynamics into governance.

Emergence of Communist Movements

The Soviet Union actively promoted communism as an alternative to Western capitalism. This ideology found fertile ground in the Philippines, where economic inequality and social unrest fueled its appeal. Local communist movements, such as the Hukbalahap, gained traction by addressing these issues.

These groups were not just political entities but also social movements. They aimed to redistribute land and resources, appealing to the rural poor. The United States, however, viewed these developments as a threat to its influence in the region.

“The spread of communism was not just an ideological battle but a struggle for the hearts and minds of the people.”

The clash between global communist ideologies and local cultural norms created tension. While Soviet ideas emphasized collective ownership, Filipino traditions valued community and family ties. This cultural mismatch often led to internal conflicts within these movements.

Key figures, such as Luis Taruc, emerged as leaders shaped by Soviet political thought. Their efforts to align local struggles with broader Cold War objectives highlighted the global nature of this ideological battle. Despite their influence, these movements faced significant opposition from both the government and traditional political parties.

• Soviet ideology inspired local communist movements in the Philippines.
• These groups addressed economic inequality and social unrest.
• The clash between global communism and local norms created tension.
• Key figures like Luis Taruc played pivotal roles in these movements.

Understanding this ideological struggle provides insight into the Philippines’ political evolution. The legacy of these movements continues to influence the nation’s governance and social policies today.

The Role of Proxy Conflicts in Southeast Asia

Southeast Asia became a battleground for ideological influence during the mid-20th century. The United States and the Soviet Union used proxy wars to expand their reach without direct confrontation. These conflicts reshaped the region’s political and social fabric, leaving lasting impacts on national governance.

Proxy wars were a key strategy in the Cold War playbook. By supporting opposing sides in regional conflicts, superpowers aimed to weaken each other’s influence. This approach often destabilized local governments and fueled prolonged instability.

Spillover Effects on National Governance

The Vietnam War is a prime example of how proxy conflicts affected Southeast Asia. The United States backed South Vietnam, while the Soviet Union supported the North. This division led to decades of conflict, reshaping Vietnam’s political landscape.

Other nations in the region also felt the ripple effects. Cambodia and Laos experienced civil wars influenced by external powers. These conflicts disrupted governance, leading to economic decline and social unrest.

“Proxy wars turned local struggles into global battlegrounds, where ideologies clashed over the future of nations.”

Local governments often struggled to maintain control. External support for rebel groups or opposing factions weakened central authority. This created a cycle of instability that lasted for years.

• Proxy conflicts were a key Cold War strategy.
• These wars destabilized national governance in Southeast Asia.
• Vietnam, Cambodia, and Laos were deeply affected.
• External support often weakened local governments.

The interplay between superpower rivalry and local responses shaped the region’s future. Understanding these dynamics provides insight into Southeast Asia’s complex political history. For more on how global events influenced local politics, explore this link.

Key Political Figures and Influencers in Philippine History

The Philippines witnessed the rise of key political figures during a period of intense global rivalry. These leaders were shaped by the ideological struggle between the United States and the Soviet Union. Their decisions and policies were deeply influenced by the need to navigate this complex geopolitical landscape.

During this era, the Philippines became a strategic partner for the United States. This alliance influenced the careers of many leaders, who balanced domestic priorities with international pressures. Their contributions to national defense and diplomacy remain significant to this day.

Leaders Shaped by Global Tensions

Ferdinand Marcos Sr. is one of the most prominent figures from this period. His presidency was marked by a strong alignment with the United States, particularly in countering communist threats. Marcos’s policies were heavily influenced by the global tensions of the time, leading to significant military and economic reforms.

Another key figure was Ramon Magsaysay, whose presidency focused on addressing internal communist insurgencies. His efforts were supported by U.S. aid, which played a crucial role in stabilizing the nation. Magsaysay’s leadership exemplified how global alliances could shape local governance.

Military and Diplomatic Contributions

Military leaders like Fidel Ramos also emerged during this period. Ramos played a pivotal role in modernizing the Philippine armed forces, ensuring the nation’s security amid regional instability. His efforts were part of a broader strategy to strengthen the alliance with the United States.

Diplomatically, Carlos P. Romulo championed the Philippines’ position on the global stage. His work at the United Nations highlighted the nation’s commitment to international cooperation. Romulo’s legacy reflects the importance of diplomacy in navigating the complexities of the Cold War era.

These leaders’ legacies continue to influence Philippine politics. Their ability to navigate global tensions while addressing domestic challenges remains a testament to their leadership. For more on how Ferdinand Marcos Sr. shaped Philippine politics, explore his cult of personality.

Economic Implications of a Bipolar World

The economic landscape of the mid-20th century was heavily influenced by the competition between two global superpowers. The United States and the Soviet Union not only vied for political dominance but also sought to shape the world through economic strategies. This bipolar world order created both competition and cooperation, leaving a lasting impact on global development.

Aid, Investments, and Development Projects

The United States launched major aid programs to counter Soviet influence. Initiatives like the Marshall Plan provided billions in economic assistance to rebuild war-torn nations. These efforts were not just about recovery but also about fostering alliances and promoting capitalism.

In contrast, the Soviet Union focused on supporting communist movements and providing economic aid to developing nations. Their strategy aimed to counter Western influence by offering an alternative model of development. This competition led to significant investments in infrastructure, education, and industry across the globe.

“Economic aid became a tool for winning hearts and minds, shaping the future of nations.”

In the Philippines, this rivalry had a direct impact. The United States provided substantial economic aid, which helped modernize infrastructure and boost the economy. Meanwhile, the Soviet Union supported local communist groups, creating internal tensions. These external influences shaped the nation’s economic policies and development trajectory.

• The United States focused on economic aid to promote capitalism.
• The Soviet Union countered with support for communist movements.
• Both superpowers invested heavily in development projects globally.
• The Philippines became a key recipient of U.S. aid, influencing its economic growth.

The long-term economic legacies of these initiatives are still evident today. The competition between superpowers accelerated modernization in many regions, but it also created dependencies and inequalities. Understanding these dynamics provides insight into the complex interplay between economics and politics during the Cold War era. For more on how bipolarity continues to shape global relations, explore this link.

Social and Cultural Reverberations in the Filipino Context

The cultural and social fabric of the Philippines underwent significant transformation during the mid-20th century. Global ideological tensions between the United States and the Soviet Union left a lasting imprint on Filipino society. These changes were reflected in artistic expression, education, media, and societal values.

Public opinion shifted as the Philippines aligned with the United States. Media outlets often portrayed the communist ideology as a threat, reinforcing anti-communist sentiments. Educational reforms emphasized Western values, shaping the minds of future generations.

Artistic and literary movements were deeply influenced by these global tensions. Writers and artists explored themes of identity, resistance, and nationalism. The works of figures like Nick Joaquin and F. Sionil José reflected the struggles of a nation caught between competing ideologies.

Cultural exchanges between the Philippines and global powers played a pivotal role. The United States promoted its cultural values through films, music, and educational programs. Meanwhile, the Soviet Union supported local communist groups, fostering alternative cultural expressions.

“Art became a mirror of society, reflecting the hopes and fears of a nation navigating global tensions.”

These historical reverberations continue to shape contemporary cultural trends. The Philippines’ unique blend of Eastern and Western influences is a testament to this era. Understanding this history provides insight into the nation’s cultural identity today.

For a deeper understanding of how colonial histories shaped the Philippines, explore this link.

Lessons Learned: Cold War Strategies in Modern Governance

The strategies developed during the global rivalry between superpowers continue to shape modern governance. These lessons have been integrated into political and economic policies, influencing how nations address contemporary challenges. The United States and the Soviet Union left a legacy of tactics that remain relevant today.

Adaptations in Political Systems

One key lesson from the Cold War is the importance of adaptability in political systems. Nations learned to balance internal stability with external pressures. For example, the Philippines adopted anti-communist policies during the era, which later evolved into broader security measures. These adaptations helped maintain governance amid shifting global dynamics.

Another strategy was the use of alliances to strengthen national security. The United States formed partnerships with countries like the Philippines, ensuring mutual defense and economic support. This approach has been mirrored in modern alliances, such as NATO, which continues to promote collective security.

Economic Policy Reforms

Economic strategies from the Cold War also influenced modern policies. The Marshall Plan demonstrated how economic aid could stabilize nations and counter opposing ideologies. Today, similar programs focus on development and poverty reduction, addressing the root causes of instability.

“Economic aid became a tool for winning hearts and minds, shaping the future of nations.”

In the Philippines, U.S. aid programs during the Cold War laid the foundation for infrastructure development. Modern economic policies continue to prioritize investment in critical sectors, ensuring long-term growth and stability.

Legacy in International Relations

The diplomatic strategies of the Cold War era remain influential. Negotiations and treaties, such as the Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces Treaty, set precedents for conflict resolution. Modern diplomacy emphasizes dialogue and cooperation, reflecting lessons learned from past tensions.

For more on how these strategies continue to shape global relations, explore the lessons learned from the Cold War.

• Adaptability in political systems ensures stability amid global changes.
• Alliances strengthen national security and promote mutual support.
• Economic aid programs address root causes of instability and foster development.
• Diplomatic strategies emphasize dialogue and cooperation in conflict resolution.

These lessons highlight the enduring impact of Cold War strategies on modern governance. By understanding this history, nations can better navigate the complexities of today’s political and economic landscape.

Comparative Analysis: The Cold War and Other Global Conflicts

Global conflicts often share common threads, yet their impacts vary widely across nations. The Cold War stands out as a unique period of ideological rivalry, but it also shares similarities with other major conflicts. By examining these parallels, we can better understand how nations respond to global crises and the lasting effects of international alliances.

One key similarity is the role of superpowers in shaping conflicts. Both the United States and the Soviet Union sought to expand their influence, often through proxy wars. This strategy was not unique to the Cold War; it was also seen in conflicts like the Korean War and Vietnam War. These wars were not just local struggles but part of a broader competition for global dominance.

However, the Cold War differed in its ideological focus. Unlike earlier conflicts, which were often driven by territorial disputes, the Cold War was a battle of ideas. Capitalism and communism became defining forces, influencing national policies and international relations. This ideological divide created a unique set of challenges for nations caught in the middle.

Similarities and Differences in National Responses

National responses to global conflicts often reflect deeper ideological divides. During the Cold War, many nations aligned with either the United States or the Soviet Union. This alignment shaped their domestic policies and foreign relations. For example, the Philippines strengthened its ties with the United States, receiving economic aid and military support in exchange for alignment with Western ideologies.

In contrast, other conflicts, like World War II, saw nations form alliances based on immediate threats rather than long-term ideologies. The temporary nature of these alliances often led to shifting dynamics once the conflict ended. The Cold War, however, created more enduring alliances, many of which continue to influence global politics today.

International Alliances and Their Legacies

International alliances formed during the Cold War have left a lasting legacy. Organizations like NATO were established to counter Soviet influence, and their role has evolved in the post-Cold War era. Similarly, the Marshall Plan not only rebuilt Europe but also solidified the United States‘ position as a global leader.

These alliances have had a profound impact on modern geopolitics. For instance, the Philippines’ relationship with the United States continues to shape its foreign policy. Understanding these historical patterns helps explain why certain alliances persist and how they influence contemporary conflicts.

“The legacies of past wars continue to shape the strategies of nations, influencing both their alliances and their policies.”

For a deeper understanding of how historical alliances influence modern geopolitics, explore this analysis.

• Superpowers often shape conflicts through proxy wars.
• Ideological divides create unique challenges for nations.
• International alliances formed during the Cold War continue to influence global politics.
• National responses to conflicts reflect deeper ideological divides.

By comparing the Cold War with other global conflicts, we gain valuable insights into the patterns of international relations. These lessons remain relevant as nations navigate the complexities of modern geopolitics.

Future Perspectives: The Legacy’s Role in Shaping Today’s Politics

The legacy of past geopolitical strategies continues to shape modern political landscapes. The Cold War era, marked by the rivalry between the United States and the Soviet Union, left a profound impact on global governance. Today, these historical influences are evident in political reforms and foreign policy adaptations.

Potential Paths for Political Reforms

Lessons from the Cold War offer valuable insights for modern policymakers. One key takeaway is the importance of adaptability in governance. Nations must balance internal stability with external pressures, a challenge that remains relevant today.

In the Philippines, reforms inspired by this legacy could focus on strengthening democratic institutions. Addressing corruption and enhancing transparency are critical steps. These efforts align with the global push for accountable governance.

• Strengthen democratic institutions to ensure stability.
• Enhance transparency and accountability in governance.
• Address corruption to build public trust.

Ongoing Influences in Foreign Policy

The Cold War also shaped the foundations of modern foreign policy. Alliances formed during this period, such as NATO, continue to influence international relations. For the Philippines, maintaining strong ties with the United States remains a strategic priority.

Diplomatic strategies from the Cold War era, like dialogue and cooperation, are still essential. Modern policymakers must navigate complex global dynamics while fostering partnerships that promote peace and development.

“The lessons of history remind us that diplomacy and adaptability are key to navigating global challenges.”

As nations face new threats, such as cyber warfare and climate change, the legacy of the Cold War provides a framework for addressing these issues. By learning from the past, we can build a more secure and prosperous future.

Conclusion

The geopolitical tensions of the mid-20th century left an indelible mark on Philippine politics. The rivalry between the United States and the Soviet Union shaped the nation’s governance, military strategies, and economic policies. This era of ideological competition influenced local political realignments and set the stage for modern governance.

Lessons from this period remain relevant today. The Philippines’ alignment with the United States during the Cold War underscored the importance of strategic alliances. These partnerships not only ensured national security but also facilitated economic development through aid programs.

As we look to the future, understanding this history is crucial. The legacy of the Cold War continues to inform Philippine foreign policy and domestic reforms. By reflecting on these lessons, the nation can better navigate contemporary challenges and seize new opportunities.

For a deeper exploration of how global strategies shaped local politics, visit this link.

Source Links

• The U.S.-Philippines Defense Alliance
• A Sea of Troubles: The Philippines and Pacific Geopolitics
• Plumbing the Past: The Impact of History on Philippine Institutions and Democracy
• Cold War | Summary, Causes, History, Years, Timeline, & Facts | Britannica
• Cold War: Summary, Combatants, Start & End | HISTORY
• Cold Conflict | The National WWII Museum | New Orleans
• Emerging super-power rivalry, 1945-1949 – The Cold War overview – OCR A – GCSE History Revision – OCR A – BBC Bitesize
• Cold War
• Milestones in the History of U.S. Foreign Relations
• The Cold War on the Periphery
• The Changing Reality in Asia Pacific
• Project MUSE – To Build the World Anew: Decolonization and Cold War in Indonesia
• 20th-century international relations – Cold War, 1945-57, Superpowers | Britannica
• Decolonization and the Cold War (Chapter 19) – The Cambridge History of Nationhood and Nationalism
• Philippines – US Influence, Colonialism, Revolution | Britannica
• Politics of the Philippines
• Red-Tagging in the Philippines: The Modern McCarthyism Threatening Freedom of Expression – Global Freedom of Expression
• Philippines–United States relations
• A New Era in the U.S.-Philippines Alliance: A Discussion with Foreign Secretary Enrique Manalo
• How the Cold War can explain our current standoff with Russia
• The Cold War in Asia After 1953
• No title found
• 20th-century international relations – War, Southeast Asia, Cold War | Britannica
• Southeast Asia’s new-old cold war | The Strategist
• The Son Also Rises | Journal of Democracy
• Subaltern Populism – Dutertismo and the War on Constitutional Democracy (Chapter 4) – Anti-Constitutional Populism
• Marcos, Misinformation, and Myopia: A Cautionary Tale – Democratic Erosion
• From a Unipolar to a Bipolar Superpower System: The Future of the Global Power Dynamic
• The politics of bipolarity and IPE in contemporary times
• A Bipolar World is More Likely Than a Unipolar or Multipolar One
• No title found
• Anthropology of Security The Case of the West Philippine Sea 2011-
• Intergenerational Communication about Historical Trauma in Asian American Families
• Twilight Struggle: Lessons from the Cold War for China Strategy Today
• Case Study: The U.S. Government in the Cold War
• From Cold War to Cold Wars
• The new Cold War: Emergence of Global Competitors
• The End and Legacy of the Cold War | Kinnu
• Imagined Boundaries? The Legacy of the Cold War on Today’s ‘War on Terror’
• The Grand Strategy That Won the Cold War