Skip to content 
Who among us hasn’t faced a tough choice? Imagine the weight of your whole country’s future resting on your shoulders. Do you stick with your own, even if it means chaos, or trust a powerful outsider with a murky agenda? This is the dilemma that faced Filipinos like Ambrosio Flores during the tumultuous American Colonial Period.
Flores, a middle-class Tagalog, straddled a line between loyalty to his people and seeking the best for them. Remember, this was a time when Filipinos were just beginning to imagine a nation of their own, shaking off centuries of Spanish rule. The arrival of the Americans, powerful and shrouded in uncertainty, threw everything into a whirlwind.
Flores had walked a complex path. A former officer in the Spanish native troops, he later became a key figure in the Filipino Masonry movement, a hotbed of liberal ideas. By 1899, he was a general in the revolutionary army, and his name was whispered as a potential successor to the fiery Antonio Luna as Director of War.
But here’s where things get really intriguing. While many Filipinos were ready to fight tooth and nail for independence, Flores, like a few others, began to see the writing on the wall. He understood that a fragile, fledgling Philippine government might not withstand the pressures of foreign powers or even internal strife.
Was Ambrosio Flores a traitor for even considering cooperation with the Americans? Let’s dig deeper:
- Caught Between Two Fires: Flores, and others like him, recognized the weight of responsibility the United States carried. America was powerful. It had the resources and the global influence the Philippines sorely lacked. But, could they be trusted to act in the Filipinos’ best interests? Or, would they become just another colonial master, exploiting the islands for their own gain?
- The Lure of Peace: The Philippines had been ravaged by years of conflict, first against Spain, and now the potential of another war loomed. The Filipino peace party, with Flores at the forefront, saw American guidance as a path towards stability and prosperity. But, could they secure a just and equitable partnership?
- The Shadow of Mabini: Apolinario Mabini, the brains behind Aguinaldo’s government, cast a long shadow. A staunch advocate for absolute independence, he viewed any compromise with suspicion. Flores, though sympathetic to Mabini’s ideals, began to see the impracticality of Mabini’s rigid stance.
Walking a Tightrope:
In January 1899, with tensions rising between Filipinos and Americans, Flores found himself on a diplomatic tightrope. He was selected by Mabini to be part of a commission to negotiate a modus vivendi with the Americans. Remember, this was just after President McKinley had issued his proclamation of American sovereignty over the Philippines, a move that sent shockwaves through the islands.
Here are some key takeaways from these crucial conferences:
- Stalemate at Iloilo: Mabini’s prime objective was to stop the Americans from occupying Iloilo. The Filipino commissioners, with Flores among them, were instructed to demand a halt to American expansion as a condition for any agreement. This put the Americans in a bind, as they were already under orders from Washington to avoid a conflict.
- Vague Visions of a Protectorate: The Filipino commissioners, though instructed to demand independence, hinted at the possibility of accepting a protectorate under the United States. However, they refused to define what that protectorate would entail, leaving the Americans frustrated and suspicious.
- A Missed Opportunity? Some historians argue that these conferences, had they been conducted with greater clarity and goodwill on both sides, could have paved the way for a more peaceful transition. Others believe that the ideological divide was too vast, and conflict was inevitable.
The Aftermath:
The January conferences ended in stalemate. Mabini, having failed to secure recognition for the Malolos Government, decided to take a hard line. Flores, though still sympathetic to the ideals of independence, was now sidelined. The war party was in control, and Filipinos and Americans were on a collision course.
So, was Ambrosio Flores a traitor? He was certainly viewed with suspicion by many Filipinos, especially after the outbreak of war. He chose to remain in Manila, accepting a position on the newly established American Supreme Court. He became a vocal advocate for American sovereignty, a stance that further alienated him from former comrades.
But, Flores was also a pragmatist. He believed that, for the good of his people, some compromise was necessary. He saw in American guidance the potential for stability and progress. Whether he made the right choice, history has yet to decide.
Flores’ story, like that of many Filipinos during this period, is complex and morally ambiguous. It challenges us to look beyond simple labels of hero and villain and to understand the dilemmas faced by a people caught between the dream of freedom and the harsh realities of power.