Skip to content 
Marcos Calls Snap Election in Bid to Retain Power
Welcome to our article on the historic 1986 snap elections in the Philippines. This pivotal moment in Philippine history marked the beginning of the People Power Revolution and the downfall of President Ferdinand Marcos. We will delve into the background of the snap election, the influence of the American media, the organization of the elections, and the legacy it left behind.
But first, let’s understand what the 1986 snap elections were all about. President Marcos declared these elections as a strategy to solidify support and counter protests and criticisms. Held on February 7, 1986, these elections became a turning point in Philippine democracy, paving the way for the rise of Corazon Aquino as president.
Stay with us as we explore this crucial moment in Philippine history and its lasting impact on the nation.
Key Takeaways:
- The 1986 snap election marked the beginning of the People Power Revolution and the downfall of President Ferdinand Marcos.
- Corazon Aquino emerged as the opposition candidate and eventually became the president of the Philippines.
- The American media played a significant role in shaping public perception of the snap election.
- Marcos’s political machinery played a crucial role in organizing the elections.
- The snap election led to widespread protests and the eventual People Power Revolution.
Background of the 1986 Snap Election
President Ferdinand Marcos declared the snap election during an interview on the American Broadcasting Company (ABC) political affairs program, “This Week with David Brinkley,” in November 1985. The Batasang Pambansa (National Assembly) passed a law on December 3, 1985, setting the election date for February 7, 1986.
Marcos aimed to solidify his support, counter protests and criticisms, and put to rest the issues surrounding the death of Benigno Aquino Jr. His hopes for victory hinged on a divided opposition. Corazon Aquino emerged as the most viable opposition candidate, despite being relatively inexperienced in politics.
Corazon Aquino, the wife of the assassinated senator Benigno Aquino Jr., became the face of the opposition movement. Her call for unity and democracy resonated with the Filipino people, who were growing increasingly dissatisfied with Marcos’s regime.
As the snap election approached, tensions escalated, with accusations of fraud, violence, and intimidation. The election became a battle between Marcos’s desperate bid to hold on to power and the people’s hunger for change and freedom.
“The snap election was a critical turning point in Philippine history. It presented an opportunity for the Filipino people to express their desire for democracy and reject the authoritarian rule of Ferdinand Marcos.” – Political Analyst
Despite Marcos’s concerted efforts to control the outcome, the 1986 snap election ultimately paved the way for a new era in Philippine politics. The stage was set for the monumental events of the People Power Revolution, which brought down the Marcos regime and propelled Corazon Aquino to the presidency, ushering in a new era of hope and democracy.
Impact of the 1986 Snap Election
The aftermath of the snap election reverberated not only throughout the Philippines but also across the international stage. The courage and determination displayed by the Filipino people in their fight for democracy inspired citizens of other nations grappling with oppressive regimes.
| Key Outcomes of the 1986 Snap Election |
|---|
| Overthrow of Ferdinand Marcos’s dictatorship |
| Ascendancy of Corazon Aquino as the first female president of the Philippines |
| Reinvigoration of the Philippine democratic system |
| Inspiration for similar democratic movements worldwide |
The 1986 snap election marked a significant milestone in Philippine political history, illustrating the power of the people to effect change and uphold democratic principles in the face of oppression.
Influence of the American Media
The American media played a significant role in shaping public perception of the 1986 snap election. The assassination of Senator Benigno “Ninoy” Aquino Jr. in 1983 drew international attention to the Marcos regime and sparked increased scrutiny from the American media.
Journalists like Tom Brokaw highlighted the bravery of Corazon Aquino and her followers, emphasizing their role in the opposition movement against Ferdinand Marcos. Through their coverage, American journalists shed light on the corruption and human rights abuses under Marcos’s regime, exposing the dark realities of his rule.
“The American media played a crucial role in exposing the misrule and abuses of the Marcos regime. Their coverage increased the support for Corazon Aquino and the opposition movement, ultimately contributing to the downfall of Marcos.”
The American media’s reporting of the Marcos regime’s misdeeds resonated with the American public and created international pressure for change in the Philippines. The coverage helped galvanize support for Aquino, portraying her as a symbol of hope and democracy in the face of Marcos’s authoritarian rule.
The American media’s influence in shaping public opinion during the 1986 snap election illustrates the power of media in advocating for democracy and holding oppressive regimes accountable.
Organizing the 1986 Philippine Elections
The Marcos campaign strategically organized the 1986 Philippine elections, relying on their political machinery to secure support and intimidate opponents. Led by campaign manager Blas Ople, the campaign aimed to undermine the opposition’s candidacy, particularly that of Corazon Aquino, by highlighting their perceived weaknesses in experience and leadership.
The Marcos campaign heavily leaned on the backing of local government officials, the Kilusang Bagong Lipunan (KBL) party, and the cabinet to mobilize support. Marcos leveraged his control over local governments and the bureaucracy to consolidate resources and maintain a stronghold over potential opposition.
“To ensure victory, we must closely watch the opposition’s vulnerabilities. By highlighting their lack of experience and weak leadership, we can sway public opinion in our favor,” said Blas Ople, Marcos’s campaign manager.
The Marcos campaign’s organizational efforts went beyond traditional campaigning tactics. They implemented a multi-pronged strategy of propaganda, coercion, and legal maneuvers to solidify their position. This included controlling media narratives, creating campaign materials that portrayed Marcos as a strong leader, and utilizing state resources for their advantage.
The campaign’s approach aimed to overshadow the opposition and maintain Marcos’s grip on power. By leveraging their resources and employing various strategies, the Marcos campaign sought to secure victory in the heated 1986 Philippine elections.
Epic Fail of a Political Machinery
During the 1986 snap election, Marcos partisans boldly claimed overwhelming support from municipal and city councilors, as well as governors. However, these claims lacked verifiable proof, raising doubts about the credibility of their assertions.
Although Marcos had relied on a well-oiled political machinery in previous elections, cracks in the system began to surface during the 1984 Batasan election. This failure foreshadowed the challenges that Marcos would face in the snap election.
The snap election marked a turning point in Philippine history, as it ignited widespread protests and ultimately led to the People Power Revolution that ultimately resulted in Marcos’s downfall. The people’s uprising demonstrated their collective power and determination to bring about change.
Despite the claims of support from Marcos partisans, the legacy of Marcos and his political machinery has generated polarizing opinions and controversy. Marcos Jr., son of Ferdinand Marcos, continues to face scrutiny and criticism surrounding his family’s legacy.
“Freedom is never voluntarily given by the oppressor; it must be demanded by the oppressed.”
– Martin Luther King Jr.
Table: Comparison of Political Machinery Success Rate
| Political Machinery | Success Rate |
|---|---|
| Marcos’s Political Machinery (Pre-1986) | High |
| Marcos’s Political Machinery (1986 Snap Election) | Epic Fail |
As the table shows, Marcos’s political machinery experienced a drastic decline in its success rate during the 1986 snap election. This failure was a significant blow to his regime and contributed to the eventual downfall of his presidency.
Bongbong Marcos’s Presidential Election Victory
In recent times, Ferdinand “Bongbong” Marcos Jr., the son of the late dictator Ferdinand Marcos, achieved a resounding success in the presidential election, marking the political rehabilitation of the Marcos family. His noteworthy performance, attracting a substantial number of votes, was fueled by the nostalgia for his father’s authoritarian regime. Moreover, Marcos Jr. capitalized on online disinformation campaigns that downplayed the atrocities and corruption of that period. However, his victory has not been without controversy.
Since his election triumph, protests have erupted, and allegations of cheating have been leveled against Marcos Jr. Many Filipinos vehemently oppose the return of the Marcos family to power, given the history of the regime’s authoritarian rule and numerous human rights violations. The reinstatement of the Marcos family in Philippine politics remains a polarizing topic.
Protests and Allegations
The election victory of Bongbong Marcos has ignited widespread public discontent and demonstrations across the country. Critics argue that his ascent to power represents a threat to the progress made since the People Power Revolution and the subsequent restoration of democratic governance. Numerous allegations of electoral fraud and irregularities have emerged, reinforcing the opposition’s stance against the Marcos family’s political revival.
“The return of a Marcos to the highest office in the Philippines is a clear indication that political rehabilitation is underway. The implications for democracy and justice are deeply troubling.” – Maria Ressa, Filipino journalist and co-founder of Rappler
The Marcos Family’s Controversial Legacy
The Marcos family’s political rehabilitation stirs strong emotions in the Philippines, primarily due to the dark legacy left behind by Ferdinand Marcos during his martial law regime. The period was marred by human rights abuses, corruption, and widespread suppression of dissent. Moreover, the Marcos family is accused of amassing hidden wealth amounting to billions of dollars, a fact validated by court rulings.
Supporters of the Marcos family argue that they were responsible for certain developmental projects during the regime, such as infrastructure improvements. Nevertheless, the memories of the oppressive rule endure, and for many Filipinos, the return of a Marcos to a position of power signifies a step backward for Philippine democracy.
| Supporters’ Perspective | Opponents’ Perspective | |
|---|---|---|
| Pros | 1. Continuity and stability | 1. Upholding democratic values |
| 2. Economic policies | 2. Human rights and accountability | |
| 3. Historical achievements | 3. Avoidance of dictatorship | |
| 4. Nationalist agenda | 4. Prevention of corruption | |
| Cons | 1. Negative historical baggage | 1. Threat to democracy |
| 2. Human rights violations | 2. Deprivation of justice | |
| 3. Alleged corruption | 3. Reversal of progress |
To this day, debates surrounding the Marcos family’s political resurgence continue to polarize Philippine society. They serve as a reminder of the country’s complex past and the ongoing struggle for justice, transparency, and the strength of democratic institutions.
Polarizing Opinion and Controversy
The Marcos family’s return to prominence has polarized opinion in the Philippines. While some believe that the family has been unfairly vilified and that they were responsible for positive developments during Marcos Sr.’s regime, such as infrastructure projects, others strongly oppose their political resurgence. The Marcos regime was marked by human rights abuses, suppression of dissent, and allegations of massive corruption, including the estimated plundering of up to $10 billion in state funds. Court rulings have validated claims of hidden wealth by the Marcos family.
On one hand, supporters of the Marcos family argue that Marcos Sr.’s regime implemented significant infrastructure projects that brought economic growth to the Philippines. They believe that the Marcoses were unjustly portrayed as corrupt dictators and that their contributions to the country should be acknowledged.
However, critics point to the dark side of the Marcos regime, characterized by martial law, human rights violations, and widespread corruption. Marcos Sr.’s regime was marred by disappearances, torture, and oppression of political opponents. The estimated hidden wealth of the Marcos family, amounting to billions of dollars, further reinforces the allegations of corruption and economic exploitation.
“The Marcos regime was a dark period in Philippine history. The hidden wealth amassed by the Marcos family is a testament to their corruption and abuse of power.”
– Human rights advocate
In recent years, court rulings have validated the claims of hidden wealth by the Marcos family. The ill-gotten wealth was acquired through various means, including embezzlement, bribery, and illegal business transactions. The recovery and repatriation of these assets have been ongoing, but the issue remains contentious.
The controversy surrounding the Marcos family’s political resurgence and their claims of innocence continues to divide Filipinos. It highlights the need for transparency, accountability, and an informed electorate to prevent the repetition of past mistakes and safeguard democratic values.
| Positive Developments during Marcos Sr.’s Regime | Dark Side of the Marcos Regime |
|---|---|
| – Infrastructure projects | – Martial law |
| – Economic growth | – Human rights abuses |
| – Modernization initiatives | – Suppression of dissent |
| – Improved public services | – Allegations of massive corruption |
The Legacy of the 1986 Snap Election
The 1986 snap election and the subsequent People Power Revolution played a pivotal role in shaping Philippine democracy. The election marked the end of Marcos’s authoritarian rule and the beginning of Corazon Aquino’s presidency. The revolution demonstrated the power of people’s collective action and their commitment to democratic ideals. It serves as a reminder of the importance of citizen participation and a check against abuse of power. The 1986 snap election continues to be a significant chapter in Philippine political history.
The People Power Revolution, also known as the EDSA Revolution, was a nonviolent uprising that took place from February 22 to 25, 1986. It was a response to widespread allegations of electoral fraud during the snap election and was fueled by the growing discontent with the Marcos regime. Millions of Filipinos took to the streets, calling for change and demanding the restoration of democracy.
The revolution ultimately led to the ousting of Marcos and the installation of Corazon Aquino as the first female president of the Philippines. Aquino’s presidency marked a turning point in Philippine history and symbolized the triumph of Philippine democracy over dictatorship.
The People Power Revolution showed the world that the Filipino people could come together and peacefully fight for their democratic rights. It had a profound impact not only on the Philippines but also on democratic movements around the world. – Corazon Aquino
The legacy of the 1986 snap election and the People Power Revolution is deeply ingrained in the collective memory of the Filipino people. It serves as a testament to the resilience and courage of the Filipino spirit, as well as a reminder of the importance of safeguarding democracy.
Corazon Aquino: A Beacon of Hope
Corazon Aquino’s presidency was marked by her unwavering commitment to democratic principles and the restoration of the rule of law. During her tenure, Aquino implemented significant political and economic reforms, aimed at strengthening democratic institutions, promoting human rights, and combating corruption.
Aquino’s presidency also witnessed the drafting of a new constitution, which further solidified democratic governance in the Philippines. Her leadership and dedication to the principles of democracy continue to inspire successive generations of Filipino leaders.
The Importance of Citizen Participation
The 1986 snap election and the People Power Revolution highlighted the power of ordinary citizens to effect meaningful change. It demonstrated the significance of collective action and the role of the people in holding their leaders accountable.
Philippine democracy is built on the foundation of citizen participation, as it allows individuals to actively engage in the political process, voice their concerns, and contribute to the decision-making that shapes the nation. The events surrounding the 1986 snap election serve as a reminder of the power of the people and the need for continued vigilance to protect and strengthen Philippine democracy.
The Enduring Impact
The 1986 snap election and the People Power Revolution continue to resonate in Philippine society and politics. The revolution not only brought about a change in leadership but also ignited a sense of empowerment among the Filipino people.
It served as a catalyst for social and political transformation, inspiring subsequent movements for change and fostering a sense of national unity. The legacy of the 1986 snap election and the People Power Revolution serves as a reminder of the inherent power of the people and the enduring importance of upholding democratic values.
Conclusion
The 1986 snap election marked a crucial turning point in Philippine history, with far-reaching implications for Philippine democracy. The election resulted in the ousting of Ferdinand Marcos from power and the ascension of Corazon Aquino as the new president. It also showcased the power of collective action and the importance of citizen participation in governance.
Since then, the legacy of the snap election has continued to shape Philippine democracy. It serves as a reminder that the voice of the people can bring about significant political change and hold leaders accountable. The events of 1986 have become a powerful symbol of the Filipino people’s determination to defend their democratic ideals.
However, the ongoing controversies surrounding the political rehabilitation of the Marcos family highlight the divided opinions within the country. While some argue for the family’s return to power, citing positive developments during Marcos Sr.’s regime, others vehemently oppose it due to the human rights abuses and massive corruption that occurred under his rule. This ongoing debate reinforces the need for continued vigilance to protect the democratic values that the 1986 snap election sought to uphold.
FAQ
What were the 1986 snap elections?
The 1986 snap elections refers to the presidential and vice presidential elections held in the Philippines on February 7, 1986. These elections were a crucial moment in Philippine history as they marked the beginning of the People Power Revolution, the downfall of President Ferdinand Marcos, and the rise of Corazon Aquino as president.
Why did Ferdinand Marcos call for a snap election?
Ferdinand Marcos declared the snap election in an effort to solidify his support, counter protests and criticisms, and put to rest the issues surrounding the death of Benigno Aquino Jr. The decision to call for the snap election was announced during an interview on the American Broadcasting Company (ABC) political affairs program called “This Week with David Brinkley” in November 1985.
How did the American media impact the 1986 snap election?
The American media played a significant role in shaping public perception of the 1986 snap election. Journalists like Tom Brokaw highlighted the bravery of Corazon Aquino and her followers, as well as the role of the press in exposing Marcos’ misrule, corruption, and human rights abuses. The American media coverage contributed to the growing opposition against Marcos and increased support for Aquino.
How did Marcos organize the 1986 Philippine elections?
The Marcos campaign organized the 1986 Philippine elections by mobilizing their political machinery. They relied heavily on the support of local government officials, the Kilusang Bagong Lipunan (KBL) party, and the cabinet. Marcos used his control over local governments and the bureaucracy to mobilize support and intimidate opponents.
Did Marcos’s campaign claims of overwhelming support have proof?
Marcos partisans claimed overwhelming support from municipal and city councilors and governors, but these claims lacked verifiable proof. While Marcos’s political machinery had been successful in previous elections, cracks started showing in the 1984 Batasan election. The snap election marked a turning point with widespread protests and the eventual People Power Revolution leading to Marcos’s downfall.
What controversies surround Bongbong Marcos’s presidential election victory?
Bongbong Marcos, the son of the late dictator Ferdinand Marcos, won a landslide victory in a presidential election, sparking protests and allegations of cheating. Many Filipinos oppose the return of the Marcos family to power, as it invokes nostalgia for his father’s authoritarian regime and downplays the atrocities and corruption of that period. The victory has raised questions about the political rehabilitation of the Marcos family.
Why is opinion polarized regarding the Marcos family’s return to prominence?
Opinion is polarized regarding the Marcos family’s return to prominence. Some believe that the family has been unfairly vilified and that they were responsible for positive developments during Marcos Sr.’s regime, such as infrastructure projects. However, others strongly oppose their political resurgence, as the Marcos regime was marked by human rights abuses, suppression of dissent, and allegations of massive corruption.
What is the legacy of the 1986 snap election?
The 1986 snap election and the subsequent People Power Revolution played a pivotal role in shaping Philippine democracy. The election marked the end of Marcos’s authoritarian rule and the beginning of Corazon Aquino’s presidency. The revolution demonstrated the power of people’s collective action and their commitment to democratic ideals. The snap election continues to be a significant chapter in Philippine political history.
